>>5966583 · ID c53abd
>>5966470
yes, agree.
See the posts made here in the context of ALL Q DROPS made.
This makes shills visible.
(shills attacking this post are butthurt much, very effective post, anon!)
>>5966583
Attacks increasing?
Context of drops mislabeled and used?
Select orgs/journalists dropping controversial info as attempt to label as whole, screenshooting, then writing articles on drops they themselves wrote?
Highlight of corrupt PAC = deflect by PAC = point to former members as method to shield?
We are being bombarded for a reason.
Look for keywords to be repeated by many (controller & coordinated roll out).
FAKE NEWS IN FULL PANIC.
(less than 10).
Q
Attacks increasing?
Context of drops mislabeled and used?
Select orgs/journalists dropping controversial info as attempt to label as whole, screenshooting, then writing articles on drops they themselves wrote?
Highlight of corrupt PAC = deflect by PAC = point to former members as method to shield?
We are being bombarded for a reason.
Look for keywords to be repeated by many (controller & coordinated roll out).
FAKE NEWS IN FULL PANIC.
(less than 10).
Q