>>7517634 · ID 162f9b
We have three things issued at 1:29 aka Q-watch time:
>IG report
>Durham rebuttal
>Barr rebuttal
We have confirmation that there are no coincidences.
So that means one of three things:
1. Horowitz, Durham and Barr are all in communication with Q
OR
2. Horowitz, Durham and Barr were specifically directed by Q+ to issue their reports/rebuttals at precisely 1:29 PM ("Why, POTUS?" "You'll find out. Just do it.")
OR
3. Some combination of the above.
>>7517634
Time[ing] is important.
How many coincidences [use of coincidences essential not to violate NAT SEC?] before mathematically impossible?
FISA = START
Q
Time[ing] is important.
How many coincidences [use of coincidences essential not to violate NAT SEC?] before mathematically impossible?
FISA = START
Q